Michigan Savings Bank v. Coy, Hunt & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendants for an order opening their default and permitting them to present a new proposed order on said motion. Motion for an interpleader.
1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.
The situation presented by these motions is, in respect to practice, somewhat involved. On August 22, 1904, a motion was made on behalf of the defendants, and heard by Mr. Justice Amend, for an order permitting, the defendants to pay into court the fund which is claimed by the plaintiff in this action, and striking out the present defendants as such and interpleading in their place George W. Miller and William D. May. The motion was opposed by the plaintiff and on August 25, 1904, the justice handed down a memorandum granting the motion and directing the settlement of the order on notice.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chapuis v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pouch v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912