Legal Opinion

Eatmon v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 7, 1990No. 89-1529PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

James Eatmon was adjudged guilty of sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-6-63, and attempted rape in the first degree, in violation §§ 13A-6-61 and 13A-4-2. In accordance with the habitual offender statute, § 13A-5-9, the trial judge sentenced Eat-mon to life, imprisonment without possibility of parole on the sodomy conviction and to life imprisonment on the attempted rape conviction.

The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Eatmon’s convictions, holding that the trial court erred in refusing to give Eatmon’s requested written charge concerning his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Ex Parte WhisenhantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Bascom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Whisenhant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  5. Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Eatmon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API