Legal Opinion

Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1996No. 1—95—3792, 1—95—4114 consPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scariano

In this appeal, we must determine whether, under the circumstances present in this case, the defendants’ assessment of fees against plaintiffs for recording the assignment of a mortgage and for the suspension of an escrow violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1992)). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the assessment for recording the assignment of the mortgage violated that act, while the charging of a fee for suspending the escrow payments was not a violation thereof.

Plaintiffs Phyllis J. Weatherman, Ruth A.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lanier v. Associates Finance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Knecht Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Metrick v. ChatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Majumdar v. LurieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Weatherman v. Gary-Wheaton Bank of Fox Valley, N.A.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stephen L. Winternitz, Inc. v. NAT. BANK OF MONMOUTHAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Pawlikowski v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Indesco Products, Inc. v. NovakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  5. Sandholm v. KueckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API