Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wedekind

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2019No. S-18-516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreudenberg, J.

*395 NATURE OF CASE

The plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action appeals from the district court's sua sponte denial, without a hearing, of his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court did so under its authority conferred by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2301.02 (Reissue 2016). The plaintiff does not challenge the statute directly, but argues that the lack of a hearing was **389 unconstitutional. The plaintiff did not file a notice under Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-109(E) (rev. 2014), which is required whenever a party is "presenting a case involving the federal or state constitutionality of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FilholmNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BocheNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Ptak v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Holdrege Cooperative Ass'n v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
  2. SID No. 596 v. THG DevelopmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. DentonNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Jackson v. RodriguezNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Stanko v. Smith, King, Simmons & Conn LawNebraska Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API