Legal Opinion

Snow v. Hamilton

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by Henry E. Snow and others against Fannie Hamilton and others to determine the validity of the probate of the will of John Snow, deceased. Plaintiffs were nonsuited, and moved for a new trial on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance. Granted.

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

The plaintiffs bring this action to determine the validity of the probate of the will of John Snow, late of the town of Ogden, in the county of Monroe, deceased. The parties to- this action are nineteen nephews and nieces of the deceased, four of whom are plaintiffs, and the others defendants. Certain legatees named in the will are also made defendants. The nephews and nieces are all the heirs and next of kin of the deceased. Hone of the plaintiffs.is named in the will. The grounds alleged in the complaint for revoking the probate are that the assumed will was not the last will of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wager v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Long v. RodgersNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of TankelowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. Ocobock v. EelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Reid v. CurtinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Wood v. FaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Shea v. BergenNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API