Legal Opinion

People v. Sze

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2014PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s claim that he did not validly waive his right to be prosecuted by an indictment is not precluded by his plea of guilty or his valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v *796Davenport, 106 AD3d 1197, 1197 [2013]). However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, he did validly waive his right to be prosecuted by an indictment (see CPL 195.10; People v Zanghi, 79 NY2d 815 [1991]).

“ ‘A criminal defendant’s right to a speedy trial is guaranteed both by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution (US Const 6th, 14th Amends) and by statute (CPL 30.20; Civil Rights Law §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. YungaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. BarnhillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. Cardona-VelasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. SuricoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API