Park v. Park
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 178, Oct. T., 1908, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Bradford Co., May T., 1907, No. 82, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mercur Park v. Sumner E. Park. Ejectment for thirty-two acres of land in Litchfield township. Before Fanning, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
This action of ejectment was instituted in the court below under an amicable agreement of the parties, in pursuance of which Mercur Park was made the plaintiff in the issue and Sumner E. Park the defendant. Both parties to the record claimed title to the premises in dispute under Benjamin Park, their father.
The plaintiff, Mercur Park, claimed the premises by virtue of an alleged parol contract entered into between himself and his father before or about the year 1889, by the terms of which the plaintiff, who had just completed his education at a business college at Elmira,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Shroyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Brinker v. BrinkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
- Smith v. TuitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Baldwin v. StierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McGinley's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Liggins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Culhane's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Swenk EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Kasson v. Rocky Glen Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.