Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1978No. 4395PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

Defendant Waldo Rangle Diaz appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft, a violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-661, 13-663, and 13-671. Taking jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S., Supreme Court Rules, rule 47(e)(5), we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.

Defendant was arrested and initially charged with second degree burglary and grand theft. After a preliminary hearing, probable cause was found for the charge of grand theft, and defendant was bound over to Superior Court for trial.

Following the court’s denial of a motion for redetermination of probable cause, defendant,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BradleyArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. BradleyArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. MendiolaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. State v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State of Arizona v. Manuel Ovante, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. HamiltonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. LimpusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API