Legal Opinion

Broyles v. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1934No. 6 Div. 586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The suit was on account for merchandise sold, and we conclude from the pleadings and charge of the court (there is no bill of exceptions) that the defense was the debt was not defendant’s but that of her husband. There were verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The complaint appears to have been twice amended, first by adding count two, and lastly by the addition of count three. Appellee insists the cause was tried upon count three, and that demurrer was sustained as to counts one and two. The judgment entry is meager and uncertain. It discloses an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. HingsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Davis v. JerrellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moffatt v. CassimusAlabama Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API