Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Watson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 20, 1981No. 80-171PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Petitioner has not employed either ARAP 10 (f) or 39 (k) to present the issue he asserts. Therefore, the merits of his contention are not before us, and we are, therefore, compelled to deny his petition, 398 So.2d 320.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bankhead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. Twilley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Ballards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API