Legal Opinion
Feliciano v. Romney
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1971No. 71 Civ. 1575PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
By order to show cause dated April 15, 1971, plaintiffs, residents of site 23 of the Milbank-Frawley Circle Urban Renewal area (hereinafter referred to as the “renewal area”), move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 for a preliminary injunction, pending final determination of the instant suit.
The relief sought, which is extraordinarily pervasive in both scope and terms, may fairly be summarized as follows: First, movants seek to require the defendants to submit to this Court a workable plan for — (a) promptly relocating poor Black and Puerto Rican residents of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Norwalk Core v. Norwalk Redevelopment AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Kaskel v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Western Addition Community Organization v. WeaverDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Ed Arrington v. The City of Fairfield, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feliciano v. RomneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973