Legal Opinion

Philbin v. A.C. & S., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered June 2, 2005, which denied the motion for summary judgment by defendant Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Edison), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Con Edison dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it.

According to plaintiffs appellate brief, the claim against Con Edison is based on the decedent’s testimony that, while employed on a roofing project at a Con Edison facility for two months during the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Murphy v. Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Mazzocchi v. International Business Machines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Tishman Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Foley v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Rivera v. Ambassador Fuel & Oil Burner Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Matter of New York Asbestos Litig.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Vickers v. ParcellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API