Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 6, 1992No. 209 M.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, President Judge.
Petitioners Daniel Bernstein and Willy Groninger filed a petition for review addressed to our original jurisdiction seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Governor Robert Casey, the Executive Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Secretary of the board, Joseph Zazyczny. Under Pa.R.A.P. 1532(b), the petitioners now ask for summary relief against changes in retirees’ health benefits unilaterally placed in effect by the Commonwealth. This court denies the relief requested.
The relevant facts as revealed in the pleadings are as follows. Both…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Richardson v. Charles Cole Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Pivarnik v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Castle v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Imdorf v. Public School Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Waters v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- (2005), Maryland Attorney General Reports2005
- Solomon v. United States Health Care Systems of Pennsylvania Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001