Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Deaver

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1920No. 2202PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). That it appeared as a matter of law that the conveyance to H. E. Fulbright and Mrs. Birdie Rutherford of 175 acres of the John Laud survey, evidenced by the deed dated October 7, 1881, was a gift to them by their father Pete Fulbright, Sr., is affirmed by all the parties to the appeal. They disagree, however, as to whether the trial court has a right to say it also appeared as a matter of law that the gift was an advancement by said Pete Fulbright, Sr., to his said children. Appellee insists that the gift was within a well-established rule (18 C. J. 938, §…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lott v. KaiserTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sparks v. SpenceTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Landrum v. LandrumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rutherford v. DeaverTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API