Legal Opinion

M & O Marine, Inc. v. Marquette Company, in No. 83-5422. M & O Marine, Inc., in No. 83-5499 v. Marquette Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 22, 1984No. 83-5422, 83-5449PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

After settling a claim, brought against it by an injured employee, for $77,505.61, M & 0 Marine sued Marquette in diversity for indemnification on a theory of primary/secondary negligence. A jury awarded M & 0 Marine $46,503.40 to which the district court added about $1,400 in Rule 238, Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure, damages. M & 0 Marine appeals contending that the district court erred: (1) in not allowing it to get indemnification upon a proof of only its potential, rather than actual, liability to the employee; and (2) in applying Rule 238…

2Cases cited12 opinions

United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. v. Delta Marine Drilling Company, Delta Marine Drilling Company v. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
Tankrederiet Gefion A/S v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

Gab Business Services, Inc., Cross v. Syndicate 627, James Neil, Eric Butcher, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
Robert J. Bainville v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp. v. Standby Power Supplies, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
Delaware River & Bay Authority v. KopaczCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
SPM Corp. v. M/V Ming MoonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
Andrews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.