Legal Opinion
Thurston v. Bishop
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1888PublishedCited by 37 opinions
Exceptions prom Mr. Justice Dole. Jury Waived.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, by
Judd, C.J. Mr. Justice Dole, Dissenting.
This action was brought at the April Term, 1888, of this Court. The jury was waived, and the case heard by Mr. Justice Dole in vacation, by consent of parties. The following is the decision of the Court rendered on the 24th July:
“This is a suit in ejectment in which the plaintiff claims for the Government the Ili of Opu, on the ground ‘tha.t it has never been and is not now awarded, patented, granted or leased under or by virtue of any land award, royal patent or Government grant or lease, and that by the law applicable in such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Demarest v. WynkoopNew York Court of Chancery · 1817
- Lindsey and Others v. the Lessee of MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Stephens v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Fullard-LeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
- Lewers & Cooke, Ltd. v. AtcherlySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.