Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Van Dyke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1924No. Docket No. 78Published

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

On November 15, 1922, plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendants for substantially $1,350. Defendants being unable to pay the-, same in full entered into an agreement whereby they were to pay $500 in cash, deed to plaintiff’s attorney two lots and enter into a contract to repurchase the same, paying at the rate of $100 per month until the judgment was paid. The deed was executed to Mr. Visscher but was not recorded. He in turn gave defendants a paper showing that he held the deed in trust, and defendants made their payments monthly until the judgment was substantially paid. They were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chambers v. McDowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API