Legal Opinion

Miller v. United States (In re Miller)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 8, 2014No. BAP No. WY-14-002; Bankruptcy No. 13-20384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARLIN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue we face is whether a debtor’s wages need to be both earned and received during the applicable six-month “look-back” period in order to be included as part of his “current monthly income” under 11 U.S.C. § 101(10A). Debtor Vede Jacob Miller (“Miller”) timely appealed the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 7 petition after the court determined that, when properly calculated, Miller’s current monthly income (“CMI”) disqualified him from proceeding under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.1 When *820Miller declined to convert his bankruptcy case from…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SchuldtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015
  2. In re: Diane Marie SchuldtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API