Legal Opinion

Fortune Ins. Co. v. Exilus

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 12, 1992No. 91-3318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

608 So.2d 139 (1992)

FORTUNE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Renal EXILUS, Appellee.

No. 91-3318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 12, 1992.

Matt Hellman of Matt Hellman, P.A., Plantation and Diane H. Tutt of Diane Tutt, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Eric L. Ansel of Ansel & Simon, P.A., and Paul J. Ansel of Law Office of Paul J. Ansel, Hollywood, for appellee.

2Per curiam

Fortune Insurance Company ("Fortune") appeals from a final summary judgment finding that appellee, Renal Exilus, was entitled to automobile insurance personal injury protection (PIP)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. GOV. EMPLOYEES INS. CO. v. NovakSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. National Indemnity Co. v. CorboDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Hernandez v. Protective Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Reynolds v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Florida Farm Bur. Ins. Co. v. ShafferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blish v. Atlanta Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Garrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  3. Almayor v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. UNDERWRITERS GUAR. INS. v. TherrienDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Trott v. FinlaysonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API