Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. “An inventory search is . . . designed to properly catalogue the contents of the item searched. The specific objectives of an inventory search, particularly in the context of a vehicle, are to protect the property of the defendant, to protect the police against any claim of lost property, and to protect police personnel and others from any dangerous instruments” (People v Johnson, 1 NY3d 252, 256 [2003]). “ ‘[A]n inventory search must not be a ruse for a general rummaging…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. MortelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. BacquieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. People v. MurrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. RoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. People v. EwartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API