Legal Opinion

State v. Jimenez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 19, 2002No. AC 22120PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Francisco Jimenez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a) and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of an elementary school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction as to *665either crime because the cocaine was not actually found on his person.1 We disagree.

The jury could have reasonably…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. State v. RiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. WraggConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. State v. Leon-ZazuetaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. DuboseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API