State v. Jimenez
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Francisco Jimenez, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a) and possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of an elementary school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b). On appeal, the defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction as to *665either crime because the cocaine was not actually found on his person.1 We disagree.
The jury could have reasonably…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. RiserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. WraggConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
4Cited by11 opinions
- Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Leon-ZazuetaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. DuboseConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. MoralesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.