Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., D/B/A CMA Cablevision and/or CMA Communications v. Ronald Lehmann and Dana Lehmann
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-07-00539-CV
Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., d/b/a CMA Cablevision and/or
CMA Communications, Appellants
v.
Ronald Lehmann and Dana Lehmann, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 13,010, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING
D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N
I respectfully dissent. By December 2002, the Lehmanns knew or should have known that Etan did not have a contractual or legal right to use Bluebonnet's easement, and had reason to believe that Etan did not have its own easement…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Brooks v. Northglen Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.