Legal Opinion

Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., D/B/A CMA Cablevision and/or CMA Communications v. Ronald Lehmann and Dana Lehmann

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 26, 2010No. 03-07-00539-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00539-CV

Etan Industries, Inc. and Etan Industries, Inc., d/b/a CMA Cablevision and/or

CMA Communications, Appellants

v.

Ronald Lehmann and Dana Lehmann, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 13,010, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

I respectfully dissent. By December 2002, the Lehmanns knew or should have known that Etan did not have a contractual or legal right to use Bluebonnet's easement, and had reason to believe that Etan did not have its own easement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Brooks v. Northglen Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API