Legal Opinion

Donald Wortman v. All Nippon Airways

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2017No. 15-15362, 15-15364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Wallace

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants All Nippon Airways (ANA), China Airlines, and EVA Airways (collectively, Defendants) challenge the district court’s holding that the filed rate doctrine does not preclude Plaintiffs-Appellees’ putative class action suit for antitrust damages based on allegations of collusion and price fixing. We have not previously addressed the application of the filed rate doctrine to airline fares and fees. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we hold that, based on the record in this case,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Carlin v. DairyAmerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Law School Admission Council Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PS) McGee v. NewmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro GovernmentDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
  3. Scott v. Arizona Center for Hematology and Oncology PLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. William Ellis v. Salt River ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API