Moreland v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Circuit Judge:
In this habeas corpus proceeding, we must determine whether a federal statute governing credit for good conduct unambiguously directs how that credit is to be calculated and applied.1 Because we con-*182elude the statute is unambiguous, we do not address whether the rule of lenity applies or whether the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ interpretation of the statute must be accorded deference under Chevron, U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.2 and its progeny. The Bureau of Prisons correctly determined the good-conduct credits in this case. Therefore, we reverse the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Capitol Services Management v. Vesta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Wright v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Moreland v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Wright v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.