Legal Opinion
China Tire Holdings Ltd. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 3, 2000No. 5:99-cv-03163PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
On January 14, 2000, Defendants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Goodyear International Corporation collectively filed a motion to dismiss the claims asserted against them by Plaintiff China Tire Holdings Limited [Doc. 4], In their motion, the defendants say the plaintiffs claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata or claim preclusion. Alternatively, the defendants contend that the plaintiff has failed to state any claim upon which relief can be granted, and that, even if adequately pled, the plaintiffs claims are barred by the applicable statute of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orion Tire Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Orion Tire Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Veljkovic v. Radisson Hospitality, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019