Legal Opinion

State v. Osborne

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008No. 2007-1597PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Appellant has filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial of the discretionary appeal in this matter, reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1413, 2007-Ohio-6140, 876 N.E.2d 970.

{¶ 2} The motion for reconsideration is granted. The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. V, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94, 2007-Ohio-3250, 868 N.E.2d 961, and the cause is remanded.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Jones, 06 Ma 17 (2-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009