In re D.A.

OPINION

JOHNSON, Associate Justice.

In this juvenile dependency case, mother appeals a permanent plan order. See Tribal Code § 714(d). We exercise jurisdiction under Tribal Code Section 310(h)(2) and affirm.

Mother makes two arguments on appeal. The first, that the trial court erred by changing the permanent plan from long term foster care to permanent foster care, was not preserved by any objection before the trial court. Under ordinary circumstances, we will not review issues on appeal that were not presented to the trial court for decision in the first place. See Robertson v. Grand Ronde, 5…