Legal Opinion
In re Piccinini
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 61-344; Crim. No. 63-225PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
A motion was here presented by the United States, plaintiff, to strike the demand for a jury trial made by the defendant in the above entitled case. This action originated at Civil Action No. 61-344 wherein the plaintiff brought suit to enjoin the defendant from violating the provisions of § 15(a) (2) and § 15(a) (5) of the Pair Labor Standards Act of .1938, as amended.1
On June 13,1961, the parties stipulated to a consent verdict. : Subsequently, on July 29, 1963, the plaintiff petitioned for the prosecution of the defendant for civil and criminal contempt because…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bowe v. Judson C. Burns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Bowe v. Judson C. Burns, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen and H. E. Gilbert v. Bangor & Aroostook Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- In Re Union Nacional De TrabajadoresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Mitchell v. Barbee Lumber Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Pineda v. Skinner Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- In Re Union Nacional De TrabajadoresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974