Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Chase v. Binghamton Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 27, 1983Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Yesawich, Jr., J., concurs in part and dissents in part in the following memorandum. Yesawich, Jr., J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

While I agree that the board’s determination is unsupported by substantial evidence, I am unable to subscribe to the majority’s declaration that due process was denied. The incident giving rise to this proceeding was a fire caused by petitioner’s six-year-old son, just two days before the notice of eviction was served. Since petitioner had no previous difficulties with the Binghamton Housing Authority, surely she was aware then that the boy’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API