Legal Opinion

Coppola v. WE Magazine, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry Cozier, J.), entered March 11, 1999, which, in an action for a declaration that defendant assumed plaintiff’s obligations under certain equipment leases, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the cross motion to the extent of declaring that defendant did not assume plaintiff’s obligations under the equipment leases, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*304The IAS Court correctly held that the general release that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. In re SchaeferNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Goldberg v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tavoulareas v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Trolman v. Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Rafailova v. Leading Ins. Group Ins. Co., Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Trolman v. Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Wellness Promotion Services, Inc. v. LindenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API