Highpoint of Montgomery Corp. v. Vail
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARREN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, holding that appellees were not in default of their obligations on a promissory note. We affirm.
The principal questions are whether appellants waived strict compliance with the terms of the note and whether the court erred in admitting into evidence a summary of appellees’ payments made on the note.
On July 14,1969, Elizabeth Fling sold her home to appellees, who executed a promissory note and a deed of trust, securing payment of the note. The note required appellees to make an installment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- McGowan v. PasolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Vaughan v. Crown Plumbing & Sewer Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Steves Sash & Door Co. v. WBH InternationalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Grady, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- Stanley v. CitiFinancial Mortg. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
- Joiner v. Elrod, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Garcia v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- Beal Bank S.S.B. v. Medway Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.