Legal Opinion

Highpoint of Montgomery Corp. v. Vail

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 22, 1982No. 01-81-0805-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARREN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, holding that appellees were not in default of their obligations on a promissory note. We affirm.

The principal questions are whether appellants waived strict compliance with the terms of the note and whether the court erred in admitting into evidence a summary of appellees’ payments made on the note.

On July 14,1969, Elizabeth Fling sold her home to appellees, who executed a promissory note and a deed of trust, securing payment of the note. The note required appellees to make an installment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Laredo Hides Co., Inc. v. H & H Meat Products Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. McGowan v. PasolCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Vaughan v. Crown Plumbing & Sewer Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Steves Sash & Door Co. v. WBH InternationalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Intermedics, Inc. v. Grady, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  2. Stanley v. CitiFinancial Mortg. Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2003
  3. Joiner v. Elrod, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  4. Garcia v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  5. Beal Bank S.S.B. v. Medway Ranch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API