Legal Opinion

Clancy v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1975PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

This criminal action hinges upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction for the offense of offering to pass a forged instrument in violation of Sec. 39-1704, T.C.A.

Petitioner and a female companion, Ruth Ida Parker, were jointly tried upon a two-count indictment charging forgery and offering to pass a forged instrument, and were convicted for the latter offense with punishment fixed at not less than three nor more than five years. Petitioner appealed and the Court of Criminal Appeals, in a divided opinion, affirmed his conviction. We granted certiorari.

I

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tines v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Keebler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. Wofford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Byrge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. State v. JenkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. State v. ErvinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  5. State v. Myron GarmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API