Legal Opinion

Austin v. Tricord Homes, Inc.

Spotsylvania County Circuit Court

Decided April 26, 2001No. Case No. CL00-350Published

1Opinion of the Court

BY JUDGE WILLIAM H. LEDBETTER, JR.

The question presented is whether this action for defective construction should be stayed because of an arbitration clause in a new home warranty provided by the builder to the purchaser.

Background

No evidence has been taken in this case. Therefore, the parties are before die court on the pleadings; so the facts relied on for this opinion are those set out in the motion for judgment, elaborated upon in arguments of counsel on April 9,2001.

Austin and Tricord entered into a written “new home sales agreement” on October 11,1998, for the construction of a house on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Doyle and Russell, Inc. v. Roanoke Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
  3. Piland Corp. v. League Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Culleton v. Hour Development Corp.Stafford County Circuit Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API