Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Howard C. Long
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 29, 1930No. Appeal 57PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This appeal presents no new question. Every point raised by the appellant has already been passed upon by the Supreme Court or by this court and decided against him. The law is settled in Pennsylvania that the term ‘medicine’ as used in Act of June 3, 1911, P. L. 639, relating to the right to practice medicine and surgery in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, etc. (See amendments of July 25, 1913, P. L. 1220 and April 20, 1921, P. L. 158) refers to its broad and comprehensive meaning as the art or science having for its object the cure of diseases and the preservation of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Graves v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commonwealth v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Commonwealth v. CastellanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schofield Discipline CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Pennsylvania State Board of Medical Education & Licensure v. FerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. NewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Micciche v. Forest Hill Cemetery Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1945
- Practice of Chiropody by Corp., Pennsylvania Department of Justice1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.