Legal Opinion

Claim of Murano v. Chrysler Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Claimant, employed as a maintenance man, was required to use a company ear to take mail from the plant to the post office, some three miles distant. On the day of the accident, he performed this duty and then bought bread which he intended to take to his home, about two miles away, before returning to the plant; and while on the way to his home and off the return route to the plant, the car was involved in an accident, whereby he was injured, after which he returned to the plant. There is substantial evidence, which the board was entitled to accept, that claimant’s use of the automobile, an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Ognibene v. Rochester Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Claim of Bowen v. Saratoga Springs CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  3. Claim of Motto v. Cosmopolitan Tourist Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sumner v. Meier's Ready Mix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API