U.S. Sugar Co., Inc. v. American Sweeteners, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In this appeal we address, inter alia, the applicability of the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11706 (“Carmack” or “the Amendment”), a federal law which limits the liability of a railroad carrying goods in interstate commerce. This appeal follows the entry of a trial court order granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of appellee Norfolk and Western Railway Company (“Norfolk”) and against appellant U.S. Sugar Company, Inc. (“U.S. Sugar”). We affirm.
¶ 2 U.S. Sugar purchased sugar from American Sweeteners, Inc. (“American”). The sugar was transported, via truck, from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Rini v. United Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yeager v. KavicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000