Legal Opinion

U.S. Sugar Co., Inc. v. American Sweeteners, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal we address, inter alia, the applicability of the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11706 (“Carmack” or “the Amendment”), a federal law which limits the liability of a railroad carrying goods in interstate commerce. This appeal follows the entry of a trial court order granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of appellee Norfolk and Western Railway Company (“Norfolk”) and against appellant U.S. Sugar Company, Inc. (“U.S. Sugar”). We affirm.

¶ 2 U.S. Sugar purchased sugar from American Sweeteners, Inc. (“American”). The sugar was transported, via truck, from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Rini v. United Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yeager v. KavicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API