Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Parry Navigation Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 21, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

The third party defendant herein, Todd Shipyards Corporation, has moved for leave to make Lamport & Holt Line, Ltd. a party to this action. Application is made pursuant to rule 14 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

Motion is denied.

This application is within the jurisdiction of the Court. General Taxicab Ass’n v. O’Shea, 71 App.D.C. 327, 109 F.2d 671; Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Edition, Page 414, Paragraph 14.05.

I denied the application because of the laches of the third party defendant. The action arises under the Jones Act, 46 U. S.C.A. § 688.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Taxicab Ass'n v. O'SheaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shafarman v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  2. Hicks v. Long Island RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Handlos v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API