Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 2019No. 3D17-1965Published

1Per curiam

*225Affirmed. See Bouters v. State, 659 So.2d 235 (Fla. 1995) (holding that the "substantial emotional distress" element of stalking requires application of an objective, reasonable-person standard); Pallas v. State, 636 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ; T.B. v. State, 990 So.2d 651 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) ; D.L.D. v. State, 815 So.2d 746 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ; McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). See also McKinnon v. State, 712 So.2d 1259, 1260-61 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that the "harassment" element of crime of stalking requires State to prove defendant's acts caused…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bouters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. McMath v. BiernackiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Seese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. D.L.D. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. T.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API