Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1912No. 17,575PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Riley district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

W. F. Ratliff recovered a judgment against the Union Pacific Railroad Company on account of cattle killed by one of its engines, and the defendant appeals. The claim of liability was based upon the defective construction of a cattle guard, over which the animals were found to have gone upon the track from the highway. The jury found specifically that the cattle guard was not a proper one; that it was insufficient in every respect in which it differed from the cattle guards used by another company. But they also returned a negative answer to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Allen v. J. A. Clopton Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Ahlstrom v. Kansas Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OsburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Gordon v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Klopfenstein v. Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. Robinson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. McMahon v. Joplin & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Frakes v. Travelers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API