Legal Opinion

Olympic Radio & Television, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1953No. 19-52PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

In our opinion on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment filed November 4, 1952, we held that the words '“paid or accrued” in section 122(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 122(d) (6) must be construed as permitting a deduction for excess profits taxes paid in the taxable year in which a loss had been sustained, although the taxpayer filed its returns on an accrual basis;. and we accordingly granted plaintiff’s motion for a ■summary judgment.

Defendant has now filed a motion for a rehearing in which it presents a persuasive argument that our…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Olympic Radio & Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Diamond A Cattle Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. Hunter Mfg. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  5. Sparton Corporation, Formerly the Sparks-Withington Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API