Legal Opinion

United States v. Valente

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 5, 1957No. Crim. 57-14PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The defendant, following a verdict of guilty of falsely claiming to be a United States citizen, 18 U.S.C.A. § 911, moves for a new trial. The only ground alleged for possible consideration is that the court “erred in excluding evidence offered by the defendant of improper arrest, detention and the denial of due process of law and Constitutional guarantees.” Actually, no evidence was either offered, or excluded along such lines. At the hearing on the motion, however, defendant complained of certain evidence that was admitted, which I will now consider.

Briefly, the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Costas Tsimounis v. J. W. Holland, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Tsimounis v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Florence Alice Paquet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. United States v. EncarnacionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Edit Sotoj-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. EncarnacionDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API