Legal Opinion

Harvey Gough v. State of Texas, Adjutant General's Department General Daniel James Colonel William Goodwin Jane Doe Richard Roe And John Doe

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided January 25, 2002No. 03-01-00358-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00358-CV

Harvey Gough, Appellant

v.

State of Texas, Adjutant General's Department; General Daniel James; Colonel William Goodwin; Jane Doe; Richard Roe; and John Doe, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN0-00421, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Harvey Gough appeals an order dismissing his suit against appellees the State of Texas, Adjutant General's Department, General Daniel James, Colonel William Goodwin, Jane Doe, Richard Roe, and John Doe (collectively the "Department"). We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API