Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Woods v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 24, 2017No. CASE NO. 1D15-4042Published

1ConcurrenceOsterhaus, J.

I vote to affirm Ms. Woods’ sentence because § 775.082(10), Florida Statutes, does not have an Apprendi-related, Sixth Amendment problem. Apprendi prohibits judicial findings that increase a criminal penalty beyond the maximum authorized by a jury’s verdict. Here, § 775.082(10) does not allow courts to increase the punishment, but only affects the form of a defendant’s penalty, whether it will include prison time or not. The maximum sentence for Ms. Woods’ third-degree felony was five years whether she received prison or not. And her eighteen-month prison sentence, after the jury found her…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API