Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Russell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1986No. 69298PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus brought under Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. See Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.Cr.App.1967).

The applicant was convicted of capital murder in 1980 and his punishment was assessed at death. The death penalty conviction was affirmed by this Court. Russell v. State, 665 S.W.2d 771 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court. Russell v. Texas, 465 U.S. 1073, 104 S.Ct. 1428, 79 L.Ed.2d 752 (1984).

After his date of execution was set, applicant filed his post-conviction…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Bridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Cuevas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Pyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API