State v. Pace
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentHooper, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent, because I believe the trial judge acted within his discretion in denying the attorney’s application. “[Because] mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, the standard of review for a writ of mandamus is whether there has been a clear abuse of discretion by the trial judge.... ” Ex parte Rudolph, 515 So.2d 704, 706 (Ala.1987); Ex parte Allstate Life Ins. Co., 741 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Ala.1999). Evidence that Ms. Gutierrez had lied about a shoplifting conviction, on both an application to law school and an application for a clerkship, gave the trial judge ample reason to deny…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte RudolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte Ben-Acadia, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Ex Parte Allstate Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ex Parte WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996