Legal Opinion · Dissent

Krein v. Row

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1922Published

1DissentBronson, J.

The plaintiff has appealed from an order of the court refusing to vacate a default judgment. Taking the statement of facts claimed by the plaintiff to be true, they are as follows: The parties were partners. Upon the dissolution of the partnership the defendant agred to pay $2,500 for the good will of the plaintiff in the business, upon the express stipulation contained in a written agreement that the plaintiff would not go into business again in the city of Uangdon for at least five years. The defendant paid $1,000 upon the original amount. The plaintiff brought action upon a note for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wills v. BrowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Bowman v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Palmer v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Cresswell v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API