Legal Opinion

People v. Fuller

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marcy L. Kahn, J.

Defendant Bernard Fuller stands convicted upon his plea of guilty of three counts of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). He now moves for the second time, pro se, to vacate the judgment pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.10. The People oppose the motion.

For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is summarily denied.

I. Factual and Procedural Background1

On January 14, 2010, defendant filed his first pro se motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10. (Affidavit of Bernard Fuller in support of motion, sworn Jan. 7, 2010.)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. RacetteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Hansen v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API