Legal Opinion
City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 25, 2003No. 01-1269PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
In 1995, the city of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio (hereinafter City), submitted to voters a facially neutral referendum petition that called for the repeal of a municipal housing ordinance authorizing construction of a low-income housing complex. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit found genuine issues of material fact with regard to whether the City violated the Equal Protection Clause, the Due Process Clause, and the Fair Housing Act, 82 Stat. 81, as amended, 42 U. S. C. §3601 et seq., by placing the petition on the ballot. We granted certiorari to determine whether the Sixth…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- EJS Properties, LLC v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Reynolds v. Barrett Gould v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.