Legal Opinion
Ross v. Dae Julie, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 19, 2003No. 1-02-1615PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE THEIS
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Robert Ross brought a negligence action against defendant Dae Julie, Inc. (Dae Julie), following a construction site accident in which Ross was injured. The trial court granted summary judgment to Dae Julie, finding that it did not owe Ross a duty of care. Ross appeals, contending that at least a question of material fact remains whether section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (Restatement (Second) of Torts § 414, at 387 (1965)) established a duty of care in this case. For the following reasons, we affirm the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sollami v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Bokodi v. Foster Wheeler Robbins, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Rangel v. Brookhaven Constructors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Pasko v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Wilfong v. L.J. Dodd ConstructionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Martens v. MCL Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Keating v. 68th & Paxton, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Phillips v. Quality Terminal Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Carney v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2017
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.