Legal Opinion

Montero v. Elrac, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered March 12, 2004, which granted the motion by defendants Ciszak and Hidden Valley to change venue from Bronx County to Orange County and denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment, and order, same court and Justice, *285entered on or about June 4, 2004, which, to the extent appeal-able, denied plaintiffs’ motion to renew their cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The claimed new evidence on the motion to renew—that decedent’s bicycle had two reflectors—would not have warranted a change in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Cardon v. Aggressive Heating Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Wahl v. GrippenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Toro v. GracinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Montero v. Elrac, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nagbe v. Minigreen Hacking GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. 212 Investment Corp. v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Thomas v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API